A
Case Study of Harley Davidson's Business Practises
Webmaster's
Note:
This article has been archived from the author's website. Although
there is no direct link to the article from his website you
can still learn more about him at this URL http://cbpa.louisville.edu/bruce
Created by: Reginald A. Bruce, Ph.D.
College of Business and Public Administration
University of Louisville
Louisville, KY 40292
(502) 852-4682 (voice)
(502) 852-7557 (fax)
With
the growing global economy, companies are looking for ways
to improve their market share. Many excellent firms have learned
how to beat their competitors through the implementation of
new management, marketing, and/or manufacturing techniques.
Harley-Davidson is one of those excellent companies whom has
challenged traditional ideas. We intend to show through this
case study that any company can follow Harley-Davidson's techniques
and lead themselves to excellence.
Company History
Harley-Davidson
Motorcycle Company was established in 1903 by William Harley
and Walter, William, and Arthur Davidson, who built their
first three motorcycles in a shed in Milwaukee. In 1909, the
company introduced its trademark bike; a 2 cylinder, v-twin
engine (the fastest motorcycle at that time), able to reach
speeds of 60 mph. However, a few years later the competition
was becoming stiffer. During World War
I, the demand for United States motorcycles overseas grew
tremendously. As a result, Harley-Davidson became a leader
in innovative engineering in the 1920's. With the introduction
of the front brake and "teardrop" gas tanks, Harley was quickly
developing its mystic appearance. The industry, which was
thriving after World War I, was diminishing quickly as a result
of the Great Depression. As one of only two remaining motorcycle
companies, Harley-Davidson survived because of exports and
sales to the police and military.
Representative
of the World War I motorcycle market, Harley-Davidson prospered
from military purchasing during World War II. Over 90,000
cycles were built for the military which elevated their production
to record levels and earned them the coveted Army-Navy "E"
award for excellence in war time production. After the war,
Harley went from producing military to recreational bikes.
Harley developed and introduced the K-model (1952), Sportster
("Superbike", 1957), and Duo-Glide (1958) motorcycles. By
1953, Harley-Davidson was the last remaining major motorcycle
manufacturer in the US.
Harley-Davidson
was taken over by the American Machine and Foundry (AMF) in
1969. AMF put the company up for sale in the late 1970's due
to a gross reduction in sales. The reduction in sales was
representative of a poor level of quality in the Harley bike
compared to their Japanese counterpart. In 1981, thirteen
members of the Harley-Davidson management team purchased the
company from AMF in a leveraged buy-out. But, within the first
year, overall demand for motorcycles dropped dramatically
and Harley's share of this market also continued to drop.
This even greater reduction in sales for Harley resulted in
a large inventory of unsold products. Harley was aware they
would no longer be able to continue their business at their
current production level and operating cost. Therefore, production
was cut drastically, and more than 1,800 of the 4,000 employees
were let go. In a move to help the floundering United States
motorcycle industry in 1983, President Ronald Reagan increased
tariffs on large Japanese motorcycles from 4.4 percent to
49.4 percent. But this increase was only effective for five
years and would decline annually.
Minutes
away from bankruptcy in 1985, CEO Richard Teerlink convinced
lenders to accept a restructuring plan. Using management principles
adopted from the Japanese, new marketing strategies, and manufacturing
techniques, Harley improved quality and began the long battle
to regain its market share. In 1987, one year before the tariffs
on Japanese heavyweight motorcycles were scheduled to end,
Harley announced they no longer needed special tariffs to
compete with the Japanese motorcycle giants; showing confidence
in the new system.
Today
Harley-Davidson Inc., an employer of 4,694 workers, consists
of Harley-Davidson Motor Company based in Milwaukee and Eagelmark
Financial Services Inc. based in Chicago, Illinois. In addition,
there are nearly 600 dealerships throughout the United States.
Harley's commitment toward continuous improvement is exemplified
in these contrasting financial statements in the table below.
1985 Corporate Results from Hoover's Company Profile Database
Net Sales
$288 million
Net Income
$3 million
Earnings per Share
$0.09
1995 Corporate Results from 1995 Annual Report
Net Sales
$1.35 billion
Net Income
$112 million
Earnings per Share
$1.50
THE
THREE M'S OF HARLEY'S SUCCESS
MANAGEMENT
MARKETING
MANUFACTURING
Management
Although
Harley was very profitable during World War I and World War
II, this status quickly changed during the 1970's. After the
leveraged buy-out, Harley's new owners realized that in order
to make the necessary improvements, they had to determine
what went wrong. After careful analysis, the management team
developed the following list of practices which were main
contributors to the problems previously experienced:
Corporate
management focused mostly on short term returns.
Management
did not listen to its employees or give them responsibility
for the quality of what they made.
High
inventories of parts gobbled up cash and reduced productivity.
Belief
in quick fixes for problems, such as throwing in computers
and state-of-the-art machinery to improve productivity.
High
break-even point that left the company vulnerable to unpredictable
market fluctuations.
Management
that woke up too late to the threat of foreign competition
because of the "it can't happen here" syndrome.
As
with anything in life, recognizing the problems to any given
situation is only half the battle. The development of methods
for improvements and gaining company wide support for implementation
was the key. The first accomplishment was for management to
learn the importance of relationships. Strong relationships
with workers can aid in the advancement of new company practices.
A good example can be seen in the following conversation between
a machinist and the Vice President of the power train plant
at Harley. "You are new here, aren't you?" asked the machinist.
"Let me buy you a cup of coffee!" (Filipczak 38). It was a
simple gesture which quickly taught the new VP how important
"relationships" were in the workplace; one of the major components
of Harley-Davidson's corporate culture.
Harley's
new management realized to survive they needed to become a
perpetual learning and improving organization. Open communication
between all levels of employees was essential. Everyone needed
to understand their roles and the consequences their roles
contributed to the company. But to develop employees to a
greater degree, management had to get them to understand the
business environment of the corporation.
Harley-Davidson
wanted the ability to develop processes and people which would
ensure employees would have the capability for rapid, effective
change based on an understanding of the whole business environment
in which they operated. In order for that to happen, Harley-Davidson
realized that individuals needed to have a shared vision of
the company values: tell the truth, be fair, keep your promises,
respect the individual, and encourage intellectual curiosity.
Management needed to earn the respect and trust of their employees.
Incorporating all of these high moral values into the entire
company structure and expecting nothing less from employees,
at all levels, helped emphasize Harley's commitment to its
team of workers. Since Harley's workers were unionized, this
could have been a major problem. But, because the unions stuck
to Harley-Davidson when times were tough, Harley today sticks
to them. The unions even censure their workers for shoddy
performance. This commitment allowed for Harley to switch
to "self-managed" teams. The plan was to create semi-autonomous
workgroups, who were cross-trained and could set their own
work schedules. Therefore, Harley-Davidson created the Harley-Davidson
Learning Center. This is a facility dedicated to life-long
learning. Its primary role is to serve employees who want
to keep their skills current. In some cases, this means remedial
training in basic skills, but mostly the Learning Center is
a place to come with requests for specific job-training courses.
Continuous
Improvement
Harley-Davidson
is driven by a constant vision of what an excellent company
should be: one that is never satisfied with the status quo
but is always searching for ways to do things better. This
is best exemplified by a manager's comment, "The day we think
we've arrived is the day we should all be replaced by managers
of greater vision" (Reid 38). All companies can and should
learn from this position and adopt the idea of continuous
improvement.
Continuous
improvement demands involvement from employees. Management's
dilemma was how to align employee motivation with company
goals. In Harley-Davidson's case, all employees take part
in a gain-sharing program and are paid cash incentives for
attaining and maintaining quality, profitability, and product
delivery goals. In 1995, more than 2,000 of Harley's 4,694
employees took training and education programs from the Harley-Davidson
Learning Center. These courses helped the company to be more
competitive and to foster employees' personal growth and development.
Extensive team-building has taken place at all levels of the
company, including team-building for union leaders, negotiation
committees, and stewards. Open communication, at all levels,
is used as a major key to achieving teamwork and employee
participation. For example, engineers are located right in
the plant, within walking distance of machine operators. The
practice of open communication is also represented in the
relationship between top management and the union.
Harley
Davidson has an untypical relationship with the union. Continuous
improvement techniques could have been stopped if the company
did not have a good relationship with the union. The
union viewed management as a partner instead of an adversary.
Management's good-faith dealing's with the union was a factor
in this special relationship. Harley-Davidson has a history
of in-sourcing; it tries to bring as much work as possible
into the plant to forestall any layoffs. The union has considerable
control over what kind of work is outsourced to other companies.
So the union is able to create a "job security" by choosing
the work that is done in-house. Bob Klebar, the president
of the union stated, "When times are good, weŽd outsource
it. But if things get tougher, weŽd look at those projects
and maybe bring them in-house to keep the employment" (Filipczak
41). He also mentioned that "instead of focusing on what we
think we have a right to, his people work closely with the
production department, and everyone concentrates on the final
customer. It really binds us together and makes us go in the
right direction" (Filipczak 41). Teerlink, Harley-DavidsonŽs
CEO, said that total employee involvement (EI) cannot exist
until management and labor can agree that they have a mutual
goal: the long-term success of the company (Reid 173). In
this joint process, joint union-management study groups identify
issues or problems and then research all possible solutions.
Management
Involvement
Management
through its words and actions must demonstrate continuous
improvement of quality and efficiency is a way of life, not
just another "program". Management must be firmly committed
to the people-building philosophy - the belief that employees
are thinking, rational human beings and therefore should be
encouraged to develop and grow. All management must be totally
committed to the EI program and demonstrate that commitment
by fostering a mutual trust between employees and management.
Don't let management "Solutions" become the problem: their
job isn't to hand down solutions to every problem. Management's
obligation is to communicate the problem. When management
and labor develop solutions together, they both have a stake
in making those solutions work (Reid 172).
At
Harley-Davidson, they believe being a leader in business includes
contributing to the betterment of society. They support community
causes as a corporation, and they encourage employees to get
involved as donors or volunteers. Charitable contributors
are investments in the quality of life, benefiting all their
stakeholders: customers, employees, suppliers, shareholders,
government, and the community at large.
Eagelmark Financial Services
Eagelmark
Financial Services, a majority-owned subsidiary, provides
private label financial services programs, including Harley-Davidson
Credit. Harley-Davidson Credit, Eagelmark's largest division
provides wholesale financing and insurance programs, including
motorcycle floor-planning, parts and accessories trade acceptance
and commercial insurance brokerage to Harley-Davidson's US
dealer network. It also provides the private Harley Card,
an exclusive credit card for use in Harley-Davidson dealerships.
In addition, Harley-Davidson offers its domestic dealers from
time to time quarterly special discounts and/or 120 day delayed
billing terms through Eagelmark in order to carry sufficient
parts and accessories inventories and to counteract the seasonality
of the parts and accessories business.
MARKETING
Harley-Davidson enjoyed a monopoly in the motorcycle industry
for many decades. In the 1970's, Japanese manufacturers flooded
the market with high quality, low priced bikes. From 1973
- 1983, Harley's market share went from 77.5% to 23.3% with
Honda having 44% of the market by 1983. Harley-Davidson could
not compete on price against the Japanese motorcycle producers,
so it had to establish other market values and improve quality.
Simultaneously,
the United States consumer base was undergoing a revolution
which mandated consumer driven products. Harley had to change
from a company which dictated what its customers could have
to strategies based on direct input from customers. A marketing
philosophy was developed based on the customers desires, gathered
through surveys, interviews and focus groups.
Image
"The
real power of Harley-Davidson is the power to market to consumers
who love the product" (Executive Excellence 6). Harley-Davidson's
President and CEO, Richard Teerlink says the bike represents
to America, "the adventurous pioneer spirit, the wild west,
having your own horse, and going where you want to go - the
motorcycle takes on some attributes of the iron horse. It
suggests personal freedom and independence" (Executive Excellence
6). Brand loyalty for Harley-Davidson is emotional. They are
considered more than motorcycles-they are legends. It is an
American icon brand. The Harley-Davidson symbol is based on
a pattern of associations that include the American flag and
the eagle; reflective of the passion and freedom Americans
enjoy.
It
is difficult to define an average Harley-Davidson buyer. The
demographics range from a blue-collar worker to a high-power
executive located all over the world. The common thread is
a
desire to escape the routine and become anyone you like. While
their competitors base their advertising on product technology
and features, Harley promotes: a mystique appearance, individualism,
the feeling of riding free, and the pride of owning a legend.
With Harley, you can live out your fantasies, as well as experience
camaraderie with fellow bikers.
Customer
Relations
When
a person buys a Harley-Davidson motorcycle, they receive a
free 1-year membership to the Harley Owners Group (HOG), which
was developed in 1983 as a program to keep people active with
their Harley. Simultaneously, it keeps the company close to
its customer. HOG has 295,000 worldwide members, 900 local
chapters and is the largest company-sponsored motorcycle enthusiast
group. They conduct four US national rallies, two touring
rallies and 44 state rallies. These rallies encourage people
to use their motorcycles and to share in the excitement of
riding. The people are given demonstration rides, have the
opportunity to ask questions, register their bikes and buy
merchandise. According to Michael D. Keefe, director of HOG,
these rallies are considered "more like customer bonding.
If people use the motorcycle, they'll stay involved" (Berry,
104 ). " What the Harley management crew, who are masters
of marketing, do well is listen to their customers. The result
is that Harley cannot keep up with demand at current production
levels" (Croghan 31). Company executives learn from their
customers by maintaining a database to track consumer desires.
Company officers spend almost every weekend from April through
October at motorcycle events and dealerships accumulating
this information.
Promotion
The
primary promotional tool for Harley-Davidson motorcycles are
the HOG activities. Not only does it serves as a customer
relations device, but as a way to showcase and demonstrate
new products. As discussed in the image section, Harley develops
a strong impression within consumers. In 1983, the company
developed a trademark licensing program which provides income
for dealers and the factory while expanding the total Harley
experience. The company program put a stop to bootlegged Harley
Davidson merchandise and offered priceless advertising.
Harley
has capitalized on the fact its product/image is chic. There
are numerous examples of fashion models draped over the bikes
and wearing company T-shirts. The company is starting to advertise
in magazines geared to the general public. Twice a year, a
Fashions and Collectibles catalog is produced with various
Harley merchandise. Clothes sold in stores such as Bloomingdales
and J.C. Penny exposes Harley-Davidson to people who may not
have thought about visiting a dealership. Another marketing
strategy, Harley-Davidson Cafes, have been opened in or near
many dealerships to lure people into the showroom. In fact,
the Harley-Davidson Cafe in New York City won one of the 1994
Restaurant and Institutions Interior Design Awards for its
American appearance. Also, Harley-Davidson's advertising techniques
are so successful they were one of the 1995 finalists of the
Kelly Award for advertising. The company is able to promote
the sale of its motorcycles by the financial services offered
by Eagelmark, a wholly owned subsidiary. The dealerships are
becoming a one stop shop for bikes, accessories, clothing
and financing.
Product
Harley
found its strength was in the heavyweight division. They also
identified and exploited mini niches, such as customized,
touring, sport/touring and sport/street motorcycles, in the
heavyweight end of the market. When Harley-Davidson was formed,
it only offered one color of motorcycle - gray and three basic
styles. The company learned it needed to give the customers
a choice and now offers a variety of models, including Sportsters,
Super Glides, Low Riders, Softails, Sport Glides, Tour Glides
and Electra Glides, in numerous vivid colors. Many of these
models and changes were developed when Harley realized their
customers were customizing the bikes and none of the revenue
from the work was going to the company. When a style is changed
or developed, Harley always develops it around their signature
image to make sure that the product is not only a high quality
piece of equipment but is also charismatic.
Price
Harley-Davidson
quickly learned it could not compete with the foreign manufacturers
on cost. Not only did Honda have a low priced product, it
was able to defeat Harley in advertising 40-1. Therefore,
Harley developed a strategy of value over price. This was
created through the development of mini-niches and the heavy
construction of the parts. Japanese manufacturers used plastic
while Harley used steel, which is able to be rebuilt and rebore.
Harley was careful not to exceed demand in production of their
motorcycles. Currently, people must wait six to eighteen months
for a new motorcycle and the price for a year-old Harley is
25% to 30% higher than a new one. By not being able to meet
demands, an attitude of must-have has developed. Therefore,
Harley has plans to double capacity to 200,000 motorcycles
annually by 2003.
Distribution
Harley-Davidson
motorcycles are sold by 1,065 dealers worldwide. The company
owns 54 percent of the market share in the USA, 16 percent
in Japan, 10 percent in Europe, and 38 percent in Australia.
The foreign markets could be larger, but the company has an
agreement with American dealers not to sell more than 30 percent
of the bikes overseas, if the domestic demand is not met.
The company implemented in 1983 a program to concentrate
on helping its dealers develop the up-to-date business skills
they need to sell motorcycles more effectively. The headquarters
sponsored training programs are dubbed "Harley-Davidson University".
The dealers are considered to be business partners and the
headquarters plays an active role in developing programs,
financing improvements, implementing support and management
consultants. The dealers also invest their own money into
these programs which allows them to feel like apart of the
company. Harley-Davidson treats the dealers not only as partners,
but also as customers. Harley has developed a very effective
marketing strategy, but it is the responsibility of manufacturing
to produce high quality and reliable motorcycles.
Manufacturing
"Vroom,
Vroom" this was the sound of the first Harley-Davidson motorcycle
that came off the assembly line in 1909. As we have already
discussed, Harley-Davidson started off as a family business
but was bought by AMF in 1961. However, during the late 1970's
Harley was loosing all of its business to Japanese competitors.
Harley was unsuccessful at making a reliable, quality product.
After going public in 1981 and losing the financial backing
of AMF, Harley was forced to make a change. Harley could no
longer improve quality through expensive technology. "The
traditional US management view of the relationship between
quality and productivity, as well as the view of many managers
throughout the world, was that they were inversely related"
(Mefford 137). However, quality experts such as Deming and
Crosby have researched these principles and learned the important
relationship between quality and productivity, "Productivity
is a measure of output divided by the inputs required to produce
it.....for every unit of defective output produced that must
be scrapped or reworked inputs are wasted. Labor hours, machine
time, material and energy inputs are wasted on poor quality
product" (Mefford 138). Realizing the validity of Deming and
Crosby's theories and the complementary relationship between
quality and productivity, Harley had to learn to simplify
and master their production process. With this revelation
and through hard work and intense commitment, Harley's production
process has become a source of renowned excellence.
Original Process
Initially,
Harley's manufacturing plants were designed to use a batch
process in the flow of material on its plant floor and the
frequency of products made. "The batch format has neither
inflow or outflow of materials while the process is running,
and has the disadvantage of high labor costs per unit production
and is difficult with large-scale production" (Folger 8,15).
Harley's batch operation was illustrated by its grouping of
machinery. "Harley's production system was a huge, maze-like
operation in which parts were tooled in large batches and
moved from one machine to another all over the plant" (Reid
156). As illustrated in figure 1 in appendix (Reid 156), operators
had to use forklifts to move the materials around the facility.
There was no straight flow process; therefore, setup times
were very high and output rates were very low causing financial
concerns for AMF. With Harley's transition from a privately
financed company into a public company, they were forced to
seek an alternative method of production to achieve quality
and productivity. The first step was to determine the specific
areas which needed improvements. It was important for Harley
to understand all aspects of the business would need to be
examined for flaws in order to develop an effective flow process.
An improved process was determined and implemented, successfully,
only after the synergy of what is known as the productivity
triad was conceived.
Just-In-Time
Although
all three methods are not new concepts in the business world,
just-in-time inventory (JIT), employee involvement (EI), and
statistical operator control (SOC) are the attributes of the
productivity triad. Just-in-time inventory "was the driving
force of Harley's quality-improvement program. Very simply,
as you operate with lower and lower inventories, it becomes
essential that all your inventory is usable. If you're only
going to get a few parts, they all have to be good ones" (Reid
150). Suppliers of Harley had to implement JIT into their
production process in order to compliment Harley's system.
Previously, Harley utilized a complex, computerized inventory
system, Material Requirements Planning, which was based on
maintaining high levels of stock, to offset any manufacturing
problems, so the assembly line would not be halted. This system
was inefficient because it did not address the manufacturing
process problems, instead "it was a little like sweeping dirt
under the rug" (Reid 151). But with JIT, "as each problem
is exposed, you are forced to identify its cause, fix it,
and move on to the next problem that is revealed" (Reid 151).
After being renamed MAN (materials as needed-to differentiate
from ineffective JIT's processes implemented by other companies.)
and concentrating on "setup reduction, focus flow processing,
containerization, parts control and operator preventive maintenance" (Reid 151), Harley recorded impressive improvements:
Inventory
turns up from 5 to 20.
Inventory
levels down 75 %.
Percentage
of motorcycles coming off the line completed up from 76
% to 99 %.
Scrap
and rework reduced by 68 %.
Productivity
up by 50 %.
Space
requirements down by 25 %. (Reid 148)
Although
MAN had top management support, without full employee participation
in the planning and implementation, Harley's JIT would not
have been effective.
Employee
Involvement
Successful
implementation of any company program occurs when there is
a commitment at all levels of the organization. Top management
must not only direct but take direction from the lower level
employees. In order to feel comfortable with this, top management
must encourage education for employees of company objectives
and develop a trust that employees will execute the right
decisions. Simultaneously, employees must learn that their
job stability is dependent on the overall health of the company.
Their dedication must be expressed in learning techniques
to continuously improve the quality of Harley's manufacturing
processes. Harley has set the following nine guidelines to
follow for successful employee involvement (Reid 163).
Management,
through its words and actions, must demonstrate that continuous
improvement of quality and efficiency is a way of life,
not just another "program."
Management
must be firmly committed to the people-building philosophy-that
is, the belief that employees are thinking, rational human
beings and therefore should be encouraged to develop and
grow.
All
management must be totally committed to the EI program and
by demonstrating that commitment foster a mutual trust between
employees and management.
Employees
must be thoroughly trained in specific problem-solving and
quality-control techniques.
Managers
must encourage participation from everyone.
Employees
must be given responsibility and authority for production,
quality, preventive maintenance, and other aspects of their
jobs.
Individual
employees must help each other develop and grow.
Employees
must attack problems, not each other-that is, there must
be no finger-pointing when things go wrong.
Creativity
must continuously be encouraged through a free, non-threatening
atmosphere.
Statistical Operator Control
In
the beginning Harley-Davidson believed that their present
machinery was unable to produce quality products. But, with
the implementation of the Statistical Operator Control (SOC)
process they soon realized that it was not their equipment
but their methods. "SOC involves using simple statistical
techniques and control charts to monitor the variation in
a work process" (Reid 179). Harley realized that this process
would only work if the responsibility of quality was placed
upon the persons who had direct contact with the materials
(operators). Therefore, Harley decided to hand the SOC approach
down to its employees on the floor. However, it took some
time for Harley to understand that they also needed to provide
their employees with extensive training in mean charts, histograms,
and other statistical methods in order for their efforts to
be a success.
With
statistical methods , the operator was now able to answer
two crucial questions about the process as it was going on:
Is the process in control (operating in a stable, predictable
range of variation)? and Is the process capable (able, consistently,
to remain with in the specifications) (Reid 179)?
The
employees eagerly took on the "ownership" of quality in order
to make improvements they have long thought necessary. With
the combination of Employee Involvement and Statistical Operator
Control these workers were able to successfully monitor the
process. If they found problems they could immediately stop
the process and fix or quickly inform management about the
problem. All of these concepts together lead to an improved
quality in Harley motorcycles. Over time, these old techniques,
synergized, led Harley to a production method that has turned
the company around.
Improved
Process
Harley's
continuous flow process proved wrong the belief that "continuous
improvement in quality and productivity was an attractive
concept but likely to be uneconomical" (Mefford 137). Moving
from a batch process to a continuous flow process can be difficult.
However, Just-in-time inventory, Employee Involvement, and
Statistical Operator control combined to make it possible.
For Harley's continuous flow process, U-form lines were used
as illustrated in figure 2 in appendix (Reid 157). These lines
consisted of 1-4 people working together to produce a finished
part. The group had containers at the starting end which held
the raw materials/ products and were taken through the "U-line",
eliminating a need for a stock room. In the example shown,
you can see how the different stages of machinery are all
arranged in a "U" shape making access easier and taking up
less floor space. Each manufacturing department has a number
of these "U-lines" arranged on its manufacturing floor as
illustrated in figure 3 in appendix (Reid 157). Therefore,
many different types of products can be made at one time.
The original "batch" took six weeks to four months to produce
a product, now it can be accomplished in just minutes with
the continuous flow methods. A reduction in lead time, inventory,
and defects greatly improves the quality of the merchandise.
The new system also allowed engineers to improve methods more
rapidly and effectively. These new methods have lead to a
source of renowned excellence. Harley-Davidson's techniques
were proven to work when their productivity levels rose to
record levels. Other companies realizing "The Story of Harley's
Success" wanted to learn these new tactics. Therefore, Harley
holds training seminars to teach other company management
personnel their improved manufacturing techniques which enabled
them to overcome stiff Japanese competition and lead themselves
to excellence.
Summary
Good
relationships, continuous improvement, employee and management
involvement, team building or employee training and empowerment
are not just words out of a management book for Harley-Davidson.
Only by adopting those management techniques and building
a solid base between the management and the Unions/employees
made it possible for Harley-Davidson to improve its management
processes. While management's responsibility is to build relationships
with the employees, marketing's responsibility is to build
relationship with the potential and existing customers. The
realization of the importance of customer feedback led Harley
to develop new marketing techniques. But, marketing strategies
would not be enough if quality and reliability did not improve.
Therefore, we can clearly see the impact Harley's improved
manufacturing process which consisted of: JIT, EI, and SOC
had on their continuously improving environment.
The
three M's to Harley's success (management, marketing, and
manufacturing) can be implemented into any company. The key
is to understand that all companies are different and the
specifics which may have worked for Harley may not work for
another. However, the concepts will be the same. If management
can grasp the ideals that Harley thrives on, today, any company
can learn to compete in this newly developing global economy.
Get
The Book - More Than a Motorcycle - The Leadership Journey at Harley-Davidson
More
Than A Motorcycle - Rated
4 1/2 stars on Amazon.com Richard
Teerlink named by Forbes as one of America's Most
Powerful People, recounts how he made corporate
history when he transformed the ailing motorcycle
company from a traditional top-down enterprise to
an innovative organization where employees become
direct participants in the success or failure of
their own company.
In Stock - Ships Immediately
or download in Microsoft e-book or Adobe e-book
formats